Condition monitoring
Detect a defined fault class from vibration, acoustic, or other sensor data. Track missed events, detection lead time, and false alarms per asset-day. Compare against a signal-processing baseline before adding model complexity.
Custom engineering / Device to fleet
Bring inference to the equipment, site, or field team that needs it. Design an edge AI system around measurable latency, power, reliability, and data-control requirements, with a practical path from device feasibility to controlled rollout.
Reviewed · Vendor-neutral guidance
01 / Decision framework
TinyML and an industrial GPU gateway solve different problems. Size the entire signal-to-decision pipeline against the actual target device.
| Device class | Candidate workloads and runtime | Primary constraints |
|---|---|---|
| Microcontroller / TinyML | Small audio, vibration, or sensor classifiers using LiteRT for Microcontrollers or a supported vendor stack. | Flash, peak SRAM, tensor arena, supported operators, sampling rate, and energy per inference. |
| Linux gateway / industrial PC | Vision, anomaly detection, and local analytics with ONNX Runtime, LiteRT, or ExecuTorch where supported. | Camera/sensor integration, CPU/NPU/GPU compatibility, memory, temperature, and service recovery. |
| Accelerated edge server | Multi-camera inspection, multimodal assistance, or a compact language model using a compatible accelerated runtime. | VRAM, sustained throughput, power envelope, cooling, model artifacts, and concurrent work. |
| Disconnected field assistant | Approved local knowledge retrieval and inference with controlled synchronization. | Device encryption, identity during disconnection, local retention, source freshness, and signed updates. |
The small runtime footprint of TinyML is not the total application footprint. Include model weights, working tensors, firmware, preprocessing, and buffers. General-purpose language models are not a default microcontroller workload.
02 / Decision framework
Choose an outcome that the site or product owner can observe. Acceptance values are set during discovery and measured on the target hardware.
Detect a defined fault class from vibration, acoustic, or other sensor data. Track missed events, detection lead time, and false alarms per asset-day. Compare against a signal-processing baseline before adding model complexity.
Measure defect recall by class, false rejects, line-speed throughput, and performance across lighting, camera, and material variation. Keep frames from the same item or production run out of both training and test sets.
Verify useful behavior during network loss, local storage limits, reconnect synchronization, and stale-data handling. Make offline identity and authorization behavior an explicit part of the design.
Test source-backed answers, first-token latency, full-response time, and behavior when evidence is absent. Reserve memory for retrieval and the application as well as inference.
03 / Decision framework
Use milestone evidence to decide whether to continue, change hardware, simplify the model, or stop the pilot.
Assess: inspect the device, sensor chain, data rights, operating conditions, and connectivity. Deliver a feasibility decision, baseline, and acceptance protocol.
Prototype: train or adapt the smallest useful model, calibrate quantization with representative data, and verify output parity after export on the target runtime.
Validate: measure acquisition + windowing + preprocessing + inference + action latency, peak memory, sustained thermals, energy, and field-quality slices. Split data by device, site, or time to prevent leakage.
Operationalize: package compatible signed artifacts, stage a canary rollout, rehearse interruption and rollback, and hand over health checks, update ownership, and drift review.
Safety-critical actuation requires domain-specific hazard analysis and independent safeguards. This engagement can inform that work; an AI prototype is not a safety certification.
04 / Decision framework
Local inference reduces runtime data movement only when the surrounding application, telemetry, and update channels follow the same boundary.
Define secure boot where supported, artifact provenance, encryption, device identity, least-privilege services, and recovery access. Check model and dependency licenses before shipping firmware or an appliance.
Specify safe behavior for missing sensors, unfamiliar inputs, low confidence, storage exhaustion, and failed updates. Use approved rollback images with compatibility and version checks; prevent a rollback from restoring a known vulnerable release.
Working materials
Download the editable materials, adapt them to your environment, and keep the assumptions alongside the results.
Work with SovAIHub
Agree one device class, one operating scenario, and a measurable pilot boundary before committing to fleet engineering.
Bring device specifications, sample sensor or image data, operating temperature and power limits, latency expectations, connectivity rules, fleet size, and device access. Hardware purchase, field installation, and certification are scoped separately.
Scope, acceptance criteria, delivery schedule, and fees are agreed before implementation.
Scope an edge AI assessmentConnect the decision to the next engineering or operating step.
Official documentation checked for this revision. Confirm the exact model, runtime, and license versions when implementing.